ChitownRC › Main Forums › Racers Forum v
3.3 bandwagon?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
3.3 bandwagon?
Michowski Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 4,630
Threads: 81
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 0
#5
04-13-2006, 10:26 PM
satoch Wrote:How quickly everyone forgets why everyone left the Traxxas motors. They suck!!!!!!!!!!!!

How do they suck? Just by the comment alone with nothing to back it up tells me its user error. And everyone is jumping on the band wagon. IMO theres no reason to get any other engine now. Traxxas's motor is a .20 at 135 shipped and has the same amount of runtime per tank as the stock 2.5r. Produces more power, tunes easier, and overall is better. Plus it just drops in.
[Image: mich1iy1.jpg]
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
3.3 bandwagon? - by Obsessive R/C - 04-13-2006, 09:57 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by thenewguy821 - 04-13-2006, 10:09 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by olds97_lss - 04-13-2006, 10:15 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by satoch - 04-13-2006, 10:15 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by Michowski - 04-13-2006, 10:26 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by thenewguy821 - 04-13-2006, 10:27 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by Obsessive R/C - 04-13-2006, 10:35 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by olds97_lss - 04-13-2006, 10:38 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by RobH - 04-13-2006, 10:41 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by Traxxas_Junkee - 04-13-2006, 10:49 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by rocco79 - 04-13-2006, 11:05 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by Michowski - 04-13-2006, 11:16 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by rocco79 - 04-13-2006, 11:18 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by snakebite46 - 04-13-2006, 11:24 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by rocco79 - 04-13-2006, 11:25 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by cemeb4dk - 04-13-2006, 11:25 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by cemeb4dk - 04-13-2006, 11:25 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by Michowski - 04-13-2006, 11:27 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by snakebite46 - 04-13-2006, 11:30 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by Michowski - 04-13-2006, 11:31 PM
3.3 bandwagon? - by rocco79 - 04-14-2006, 12:02 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)